Skip to main content

2025

Global Sustainable Aviation Fuel Report

Market Overview

03 | Market Overview

The global market for SAF is in a nascent yet rapidly developing stage, driven by the urgent need to reduce carbon emissions in the aviation sector. There has been significant progress in SAF production, adoption, and regulatory support over the past few years. While challenges related to cost and scalability remain, the concerted efforts of governments, industry players, and technological innovators provide a promising outlook for the future of SAFs. The next few years will be pivotal in determining the extent to which SAF can transform the aviation industry and help achieve a more sustainable future for air travel. This chapter sets out a high-level view of the current state of the SAF industry, its key stakeholders and the economic forces at play.

Figure 2 – 2030 Projected Global Capacity by Region, Based on SAF Announcements and SAF Policies Implemented and Announced

The annual production capacity for SAF is still relatively limited compared to the total jet fuel demand. Estimates suggest that SAF production in 2023 was around 0.1% of the total aviation fuel consumption, though this number is expected to increase significantly in the coming years. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) estimates indicate that during 2024, even after anticipated increases in supply, the share of SAF may reach 0.5% of total aviation fuel consumption (IATA, 2023). These small percentages contrast starkly versus projections indicating that SAF could constitute up to 10% of global jet fuel demand by 2030, contingent on continued investment and supportive policies.

Decarbonization targets set by governments and associated policies that necessitate the aviation industry to move to greener fuels give guidance to future demand trajectories. Several countries have introduced blending mandates requiring airlines to use a certain percentage of SAF, these are crucial for driving demand and encouraging investment in SAF infrastructure. For example, the European Union’s ReFuelEU Aviation initiative aims for a 2% SAF blend by 2025, increasing to 63% by 2050.

To complement policy driven requirements, and to support commitment to state level targets, governments in the United States, European Union, and other regions have implemented subsidies, tax credits, and grant incentives to promote SAF production and use. The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), for instance, provides significant financial incentives for SAF production

Figure 1: SAF Blending Commitments by Airline Carrier

Source: HCS Group, 2023

Voluntary commitments to SAF by airlines are bolstering demand projections. Instead of relying solely on conventional carbon offset routes, airlines are increasingly adopting SAF offtake agreements to reduce their carbon footprints. As of December 2023, more than 43 airlines have made voluntary commitments to blend SAF into their fuel supply (HCS Group, 2023). In alignment with these commitments, the IATA, the trade association for the world’s airlines, comprising 330 members, has committed to reach net zero CO2 emissions by 2050 (IATA, 2023).

Whilst voluntary commitments are not legally binding, and policy makers can change course, the unified signaling from industry participants provides a clear direction for the SAF industry as a whole. Forecasts done by Dutch fuel supplier SkyNRG show an increase in SAF production capacity to 17.3 million tonnes by 2030, up significantly from 4 million tonnes in 2023. Similarly, to reach its decarbonization targets, the IATA estimates global demand will be in the region of 360 million tonnes by 2050, representing a 99.9% increase from current levels. Landmark legislation on SAF in the EU, the US, and the UK will act as the primary demand driver. SkyNRG estimates that Europe and the US could have around 120 million tonnes of SAF capacity installed by 2050 (SkyNRG, 2024).

Source: SkyNRG

Supply Gap & SAF Economics

The current global supply of SAF falls significantly short of the estimated requirement needed to meet decarbonization goals. The World Economic Forum (WEF) has estimated that between 40 to 50 million tonnes of SAF will be necessary to achieve these targets (WEF, 2024). However, existing offtake contracts account for only a small fraction of this requirement, with the IATA estimating around 13 million tonnes (IATA, 2023). This presents a compelling case for the SAF business case and growth opportunity whereby announced SAF production capacities cover only 30% to 40% of the projected SAF demand by 2030.

The supply gap essentially represents a lack of confidence from industry participants in committing to the future SAF economics and adoption. Several factors contribute to this uncertainty, including technology risks, financing dynamics, policy risks and country-specific challenges.

Figure 3: Projected Demand-supply Gap in Million Tonnes

Source: WEF, 2024

The economics of SAF production and adoption present several challenges. Rapid growth in commercial-scale production is crucial to reducing SAF costs, but currently, SAF trades at a significant premium over conventional aviation fuel. This cost disparity discourages widespread adoption, creating a dislocation and commercial friction within airlines, requiring either reductions in margins or else passing higher costs on to consumers which is likely to adversely impact sales. It is difficult for airlines to have confidence in how willing end consumers will be to pay premium airfares to compensate for the increased cost of green-fuels.

Figure 4: Premium Associated with SAF vs Conventional Fuels

Source: WEF, 2024

SAF’s share in total aviation fuel consumption (currently less than 1%) is typically exchanged at prices more than twice as expensive as conventional fuel. The SAF market, being relatively nascent with limited volumes, also suffers from opaque pricing based on private negotiations rather than market forces. The total cost for purchasing SAF, produced using the currently most commercially viable ‘Hydrotreated Esters and Fatty Acids’ (HEFA) method, is estimated to be 2.0 to 2.5 times higher than that of conventional fuel (WEF, 2023). For airlines, this translates to an estimated 300% increase in fuel costs, which significantly hinders large-scale adoption and commercial scalability.Although policy directives focus on stimulating demand through regulation they do not solve the challenge of increasing pricing across the supply chain and ultimately for the end customer. This creates a dislocation within the industry disincentivising airlines from being a first-mover. The absence of final investment decisions in Europe for green-premium production methods such as Power-to-Liquid (PtL) projects, which use exclusively renewable energy sources to produce SAF, highlights the cost challenges faced by financiers.

Source: WSJ, 2023

Looking ahead, the average energy cost in the aviation industry will depend on the share of renewable fuels, their production costs, and aircraft fuel efficiency. A 13% to 15% share of SAF by 2030 could increase average fuel costs by 15% to 20%. However, by considering aircraft fuel efficiency, the cost increase per revenue passenger kilometre might be significantly offset by improvements in fuel consumption. By 2050, the Mission Possible Partnership organisation estimates a fully decarbonized aviation sector could see a 90% to 190% rise in average fuel costs (MPP, 2022). Technological advancements, such as battery-electric aircraft and hydrogen-based fuels, could help reduce costs on a per passenger kilometre basis, however these projections carry significant uncertainty. Diversifying production pathways beyond HEFA, such as AtJ, may be key to finding more commercially viable avenues to SAF production and reducing costs.

To meet the increasing demand for SAF, substantial investment in infrastructure is crucial. By 2050, an estimated $2.4 trillion investment will be required for upstream infrastructure alone, encompassing refineries, storage facilities, and distribution networks. However, currently, less than 1% of the necessary infrastructure is in place globally, indicating a significant gap in investment (WEF, 2024).

Figure 6: Projected Average Cost Rise Relative to the Fossil-based Jet Fuel Cost as of 2022

Source: MPP, 2022

The reluctance of infrastructure investors to commit to SAF projects stems from uncertainty regarding the business case and how costs will be distributed. The narrow profit margins and high capital costs associated with such projects further deter private equity (PE) involvement. To mitigate risk and attract investment, early-stage technologies like PtL may require state-level funding or public- private partnerships (PPP) to de-risk private sector involvement. Additionally, existing biofuel refiners could repurpose their facilities for SAF production, provided there are incentives and opportunities to do so.

The next 2-3 years will be crucial for scaling up SAF production, with approximately €1 trillion in capital expenditure (CAPEX) needed to establish 450-950 new production sites by 2030 (PwC, 2023). As production volumes increase and efficiencies improve, capex costs are expected to decline. Economies of scale in advanced technology systems that form integral parts of the production process such as electrolyzers and carbon capture will be critical to improvements in project economics .

Regions with high renewable energy penetration will be particularly attractive for investment, given the importance of renewable electricity in SAF production, especially for e-kerosene projects. Focusing on renewable energy sources not only supports the sustainability of SAF production but also enhances the long-term economic viability of such projects.

Several non-financial challenges also impede the growth prospects of SAF. Allocating agricultural land for biomass feedstock supply is particularly challenging in regions like Europe, where land for biomass feedstock might conflict with food production. For instance, meeting the UK’s biofuel demand with crops like rapeseed could require 68% of the country’s agricultural land. Competing land uses for renewable energy projects, such as wind and solar PV generation, also create conflicts (Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 2023). Other growing sectors with similarly high land requirements include nature-based carbon removal/sequestration and hydrogen storage (ScienceDirect, 2023). Unplanned land diversion for SAF energy crops could negatively impact the carbon footprint by releasing stored carbon from forests and reducing their sequestration capacity (WRI, 2023). A renewed focus on sustainable agriculture is fostering mutually beneficial ventures between producers and biomass feedstock suppliers (Greenair, 2023). Furthermore, new production pathways can diversify the feedstock requirements which may alleviate agricultural challenges.

The implication of the supply gap and economic challenges of SAF is an industry that is heavily dependant on, and therefore sensitive to, policy frameworks. Changes in regulations or incentives have the potential to significantly shape or alter the path to transition and decarbonization of the aviation industry. The lack of visibility on green airfare price elasticity and the degree of commitment from policy makers to require the aviation industry to go green creates a maze for investors and industry participants to navigate in determining the pathway to SAF uptake. Feedstock producers, SAF producers, ancillary fuel service providers, their development programmes and airlines will all form an important part of a collaborative effort to decarbonise aviation, whilst competing for the same policy driven economics.